4.7 Article

The impact of a ka over bar nuka silvopastoral system on surface runoff and sediment and nutrient losses in New Zealand hill country

Journal

CATENA
Volume 213, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2022.106215

Keywords

Poplar silvopastures; Soil erosion; Soil conservation; Agroforestry; Tree effects; Ecosystem services

Funding

  1. Massey University doctoral scholarship programme, New Zealand
  2. Greater Wellington Regional Council, Masterton, New Zealand [RM22793]
  3. New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment research program Smarter Targeting of Erosion Control (STEC) [C09X1804]
  4. C. Alma Baker Trust, New Zealand [RM23081]
  5. New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment (MBIE) [C09X1804] Funding Source: New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment (MBIE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compares the surface runoff and sediment and nutrient losses between pasture plots with and without Kunzea robusta trees and finds that the losses are much greater in pasture with Kunzea robusta trees. This is likely due to livestock preferentially grazing the pasture under the trees, leading to increased soil erosion. More research is needed to explore mitigation options in other hill country farms and grazing conditions.
New Zealand hill country is a pastoral region that has high levels of surface runoff and sediment and nutrient losses. Silvopastoralism has potential to mitigate these losses via the interaction of trees with the soil, pasture and livestock. This study compares surface runoff and sediment and nutrient losses (nitrogen and phosphorus) in pasture plots with and without Kunzea robusta (ka over bar nuka) trees and investigates the reasons for the variation in these losses between ka over bar nuka pasture and open pasture. Annual surface runoff was 54.0 mm in ka over bar nuka pasture and 7.6 mm in open pasture despite ka over bar nuka pasture having improved soil conditions (in terms of porosity, organic matter and soil fertility). Ka over bar nuka pasture had species indicative of good pasture condition even though the plots had significantly less standing grass biomass. This was most likely due to livestock preferentially grazing the pasture under ka over bar nuka which led to less attenuation of surface runoff. Sediment and nutrient losses were 10-100 times greater in ka over bar nuka pasture, mainly due to the increase in surface runoff, but also because of livestock concentrating nutrients under the trees through excreta deposition. These results are contrary to past silvopastoral research and highlights that an extreme choice between shaded areas of good pasture condition and unshaded areas of poor pasture condition within a pastoral hillside can lead to negative consequences in terms of surface runoff and contaminant losses because of livestock interactions. More research is required to understand these processes in other hill country farms and grazing conditions, and explore mitigation options.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available