4.8 Article

Dual-templating strategy for the fabrication of graphene oxide, reduced graphene oxide and composite scaffolds with hierarchical architectures

Journal

CARBON
Volume 189, Issue -, Pages 186-198

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2021.12.054

Keywords

Graphene oxide; Reduced graphene oxide; Hierarchical scaffolds; Graphene composites; Bone tissue engineering; Pickering emulsions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A dual-templating method is developed to fabricate graphene oxide (GO) scaffolds with interconnected hierarchical porosity for bone tissue engineering. The method involves freezing and drying high internal phase emulsions stabilized by GO sheets, resulting in the templating of large and small pores by oil droplets and ice crystals, respectively. This approach enables the synthesis of complex hierarchical architectures in reduced graphene oxide (rGO) and GO composite scaffolds.
The broad applications of graphene-based scaffolds demand fabrication methods that are simple and yet can create complex architectures. This is particularly true for bone tissue engineering, where interconnected, micro and macro porosity is required for cell penetration and nutrient exchange. Here, a dualtemplating method is developed to produce graphene oxide (GO) scaffolds with interconnected hierarchical porosity: upon freezing and drying high internal phase emulsions exclusively stabilized by GO sheets, large pores are templated by the oil droplets, and small pores by ice crystals formed in the water phase, whose size can be controlled by freezing temperature. The resulting scaffolds are excellent substrates for mesenchymal stem cell penetration and growth. This method also enables the synthesis of complex hierarchical architectures in reduced graphene oxide (rGO) and GO composite scaffolds, through a single, versatile strategy. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available