4.1 Article

Hydrometallurgical recycling of waste NdFeB magnets: design of experiment, optimisation of low concentrations of sulphuric acid leaching and process analysis

Journal

CANADIAN METALLURGICAL QUARTERLY
Volume 62, Issue 1, Pages 107-118

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00084433.2022.2058152

Keywords

Leaching; rare earth elements; NdFeB magnets; design of experiment; Taguchi method

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the dissolution of NdFeB magnet powders in sulfuric acid solution and found that the concentration of sulfuric acid is a key factor for the dissolution of iron and REEs. The solid-to-liquid ratio and stirring speed had minor effects on the dissolution. The maximum extraction of iron and REEs was achieved under optimal conditions.
Efficient recovery of rare earth elements (REEs) from scrap NdFeB magnets is a significant requirement for a circular economy. Therefore, the development of a cost-effective and environmentally friendly leaching process for the dissolution of iron and REEs has received extensive interest. In this study, the dissolution of NdFeB magnet powders in sulphuric acid solution was investigated in detail. Taguchi orthogonal array was employed for the first time to define and optimise the influence of sulphuric acid concentration, solid-to-liquid ratio and stirring speed on the extraction of iron and rare earth elements (REEs). The acid concentration of sulphuric acid was determined as a key factor for iron and REEs dissolution, while solid-to-liquid ratio and stirring speed slightly affected the dissolution of REEs and iron. Maximum iron and REEs extraction were achieved under optimal conditions as the sulphuric acid concentration of 1 M, solid-to-liquid ratio of 1/15 and stirring speed of 350 rev min(-1). Consequently, after the validation experiment, it was proved that the design of experiments based on Taguchi orthogonal array is an efficient way for the optimisation of process parameters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available