4.4 Article

Enumerating Plausible Multifault Ruptures in Complex Fault Systems with Physical Constraints

Journal

BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA
Volume 112, Issue 4, Pages 1806-1824

Publisher

SEISMOLOGICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1785/0120210322

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) through the Intergovernmental Personnel Act
  2. W. M. Keck Foundation
  3. Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC) [11760]
  4. USGS Cooperative Agreement [G17AC00047]
  5. National Science Foundation [EAR-1600087]
  6. USGS [G20AP00101]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a new model is proposed to determine the set of possible multifault ruptures in an interconnected fault system. Compared to existing rules, the proposed rules are insensitive to discretization details, have more permissiveness, and higher connectivity. By modeling the fault system and comparing with ruptures generated by an earthquake simulator, it is found that the proposed model performs better in meeting real-world conditions.
We propose a new model for determining the set of plausible multifault ruptures in an interconnected fault system. We improve upon the rules used in the Third Uniform consistency of ruptures. We replace UCERF3???s simple azimuth change rules with new Coulomb favorability metrics and increase the maximum jump distance to 15 km. Although the UCERF3 rules were appropriate for faults with similar rakes, the Coulomb calculations used here inherently encode preferred orientations between faults with different rakes. Our new rules are designed to be insensitive to discretization details and are generally more permissive than their UCERF3 counterparts; they allow more than twice the connectivity compared with UCERF3, yet heavily penalize long ruptures that take multiple improbable jumps. The set of all possible multifault ruptures in the California fault system is nearly infinite, but our model produces a tractable set of 326,707 ruptures (a modest 29% increase over UCERF3, despite the greatly increased connectivity). Inclusion in the rupture set does not dictate that a rupture receives a significant rate in the final model; rupture rates are subsequently determined by data constraints used in an inversion. We describe the rupture building algorithm and its components in detail and provide comparisons with ruptures generated by a physics-based multicycle earthquake simulator. We find that greater than twice as many ruptures generated by the simulator violate the UCERF3 rules than violate our proposed model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available