4.7 Article

What Is a Cloud? Toward a More Precise Definition

Journal

BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY
Volume 103, Issue 8, Pages E1894-E1929

Publisher

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0032.1

Keywords

Atmosphere; Clouds; Cloud retrieval

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper discusses the definition of clouds, highlighting the differences between AMS and WMO definitions, as well as information on cloud observation and detection.
There are a couple of reasons to stimulate a discussion about the definition of clouds. One reason is that the American Meteorological Society (AMS) and the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) define clouds differently, and that in two aspects. AMS defines clouds as visible objects, and WMO as perceivable objects. Furthermore, AMS includes all minute particles independent of their nature and composition whereas WMO considers only such minute particles that consist of water, ice, or a mixture of both. Additionally, the so- called invisible or subvisible clouds are perceivable objects in the definition of WMO but not of AMS. Clouds can be observed by humans and be detected by active and passive sensors from ground and space. The detection limits of instruments span more than two orders of magnitude in visible optical thickness ranging from about 0.001 from satellite lidar (in case of horizontal and vertical averaging or 0.07 for single lidar shots) to about 0.3 to 0.45 for multispectral satellite imaging spectrometers. Human observers see clouds when their optical thickness is larger than about 0.03 at day and 0.05 at night. This paper gives a brief overview of cloud detection from ground and space and of the occurrence, characteristics, and impacts of subvisible clouds. Pros and cons of these definitions are discussed, followed by a proposal for a more precise definition. This definition is, like those of AMS and WMO, a one-parametric definition and does not cover all aspects of clouds.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available