4.6 Article

Evaluation of the Nallasamy formula: a stacking ensemble machine learning method for refraction prediction in cataract surgery

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-320599

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Lighthouse Guild, New York, NY
  2. National Eye Institute, Bethesda, MD [1R01EY026641-01A1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of the study was to develop a new method for intraocular lens power selection in cataract patients receiving Alcon SN60WF lenses. The study found that the Nallasamy formula outperformed seven existing methods on overall mean absolute error, median absolute error, and percentage of eyes within 0.5 diopters of prediction.
Aims To develop a new intraocular lens power selection method with improved accuracy for general cataract patients receiving Alcon SN60WF lenses. Methods and analysis A total of 5016 patients (6893 eyes) who underwent cataract surgery at University of Michigan's Kellogg Eye Center and received the Alcon SN60WF lens were included in the study. A machine learning-based method was developed using a training dataset of 4013 patients (5890 eyes), and evaluated on a testing dataset of 1003 patients (1003 eyes). The performance of our method was compared with that of Barrett Universal II, Emmetropia Verifying Optical (EVO), Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, PearIDGS and SRK/T. Results Mean absolute error (MAE) of the Nallasamy formula in the testing dataset was 0.312 Dioptres and the median absolute error (MedAE) was 0.242 D. Performance of existing methods were as follows: Barrett Universal II MAE=0.328 D, MedAE=0.256 D; EVO MAE=0.322 D, MedAE=0.251 D; Haigis MAE=0.363 D, MedAE=0.289 D; Hoffer Q MAE=0.404 D, MedAE=0.331 D; Holladay 1 MAE=0.371 D, MedAE=0.298 D; PearIDGS MAE=0.329 D, MedAE=0.258 D; SRK/T MAE=0.376 D, MedAE=0.300 D. The Nallasamy formula performed significantly better than seven existing methods based on the paired Wilcoxon test with Bonferroni correction (p<0.05). Conclusions The Nallasamy formula (available at https://lenscalc.com/) outperformed the seven other formulas studied on overall MAE, MedAE, and percentage of eyes within 0.5 D of prediction. Clinical significance may be primarily at the population level.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available