Journal
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 75, Issue 3, Pages 550-592Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bmsp.12267
Keywords
statistical evidence; evidence interval; Bayesian evidence value; principle of least surprise; full Bayesian evidence test (FBET); full Bayesian significance test (FBST); region of practical equivalence (ROPE); Bayesian hypothesis testing; interval estimation; credible interval
Categories
Funding
- ProjektDEAL
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In this paper, a new theory for Bayesian hypothesis testing and interval estimation is presented. The proposed Bayesian evidence interval solves the problems of traditional Bayesian interval estimates and unifies Bayesian hypothesis testing and parameter estimation. The method is universally applicable and computationally efficient.
Interval estimation is one of the most frequently used methods in statistical science, employed to provide a range of credible values a parameter is located in after taking into account the uncertainty in the data. However, while this interpretation only holds for Bayesian interval estimates, these suffer from two problems. First, Bayesian interval estimates can include values which have not been corroborated by observing the data. Second, Bayesian interval estimates and hypothesis tests can yield contradictory conclusions. In this paper a new theory for Bayesian hypothesis testing and interval estimation is presented. A new interval estimate is proposed, the Bayesian evidence interval, which is inspired by the Pereira-Stern theory of the full Bayesian significance test (FBST). It is shown that the evidence interval is a generalization of existing Bayesian interval estimates, that it solves the problems of standard Bayesian interval estimates and that it unifies Bayesian hypothesis testing and parameter estimation. The Bayesian evidence value is introduced, which quantifies the evidence for the (interval) null and alternative hypothesis. Based on the evidence interval and the evidence value, the (full) Bayesian evidence test (FBET) is proposed as a new, model-independent Bayesian hypothesis test. Additionally, a decision rule for hypothesis testing is derived which shows the relationship to a widely used decision rule based on the region of practical equivalence and Bayesian highest posterior density intervals and to the e-value in the FBST. In summary, the proposed method is universally applicable, computationally efficient, and while the evidence interval can be seen as an extension of existing Bayesian interval estimates, the FBET is a generalization of the FBST and contains it as a special case. Together, the theory developed provides a unification of Bayesian hypothesis testing and interval estimation and is made available in the R package fbst.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available