4.4 Article

Advance care planning in primary care or patients with gastrointestinal cancer: feasibility randomised trial

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE
Volume 72, Issue 721, Pages E571-E580

Publisher

ROYAL COLL GENERAL PRACTITIONERS
DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0700

Keywords

advance care planning; anticipatory care planning; cancer; general practice; mixed methods; primary health care

Funding

  1. Macmillan Cancer Support [6488086]
  2. NHS Lothian via Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a primary care ACP intervention for patients with incurable cancer. The researchers found that 45% of participants in the intervention group completed an ACP plan, compared to 59% in the control group. The study also identified prevalent social norms associating ACP with dying among the interviewed participants.
Background Advance (anticipatory) care planning (ACP) requires discussions between patients and healthcare professionals about planning for future deterioration in health. ACP improves care coordination but uptake is broiled and often deferred. Aim To assess the feasibility and acceptability to patients, carers. and GPs of a primary care ACP intervention for people with incurable oesophageal, gastric, or pancreatic cancer. Design and setting A 12-month feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT) in a Scottish Cancer Network. Method Patients aged >= 18 years starting palliative oncology treatment were randomised 11 to an ACP intervention or standard care. Patients in the intervention group received an oncologist leiter supporting them to request a GP review along with a patient information leaflet about ACP. Pre-specified analyses with masking included trial recruitment and retention. ACP completion, and quality-of-life questionnaires (EuroQol EQ-5D-5L and ICECAP Supportive Care Measure) at baseline. 6. 12. 24. and 48 weeks. Qualitative interviews with purposive sampling explored patient, carer, and GP experiences. Results Of 99 eligible participants (269 screened), 46% were recruited (n = 46) and randomised; 25 to intervention and 21 to control By 12 weeks. 45% (n = 9/20) of the individuals in the intervention and 59% (n = 10/17) in the control group had a documented ACP plan. By 24 weeks, 30% (n = 14) had died; in the remaining participants quality of life was maintained at 24 weeks except for physical symptoms. Social norms associating ACP with dying were prevalent among 23 participants interviewed. No psychological or clinical harms were identified. Conclusion An RCT of ACP for people with incurable cancer in primary care is feasible. Patient, carer, and GP attitudes and behaviours determined acceptability and timing of rare planning.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available