4.6 Article

Polymer-Free Biolimus A9-Coated Stents in the Treatment of De Novo Coronary Lesions 4-and 12-Month Angiographic Follow-Up and Final 5-Year Clinical Outcomes of the Prospective, Multicenter BioFreedom FIM Clinical Trial

Journal

JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 51-64

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.09.008

Keywords

biolimus; carrier-free; coronary artery disease; drug-coated stent(s); percutaneous coronary intervention; polymer-free

Funding

  1. Biosensors Europe SA
  2. Medtronic
  3. Daiichi-Sankyo
  4. Boston Scientific
  5. Abbott Vascular
  6. Biosensors
  7. Elixir Medical
  8. Bristol-Myers Squibb/Sanofi Pharmaceuticals
  9. Eli Lilly
  10. AstraZeneca
  11. Medicines Company
  12. Lilly/Daiichi-Sankyo
  13. Bayer
  14. CSL Behring
  15. Covidien
  16. Merck
  17. Osprey Medical
  18. Regado Biosciences
  19. Sanofi-Aventis
  20. Watermark Research Partners
  21. Janssen Pharmaceuticals/Johnson Johnson

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and long-term outcomes of a novel polymer/carrier-free drug-coated stent (DCS) in patients with de novo coronary lesions. BACKGROUND The BioFreedom (BFD) DCS incorporates a low-profile, stainless-steel platform, with a surface that has been modified to create a selectively microstructured abluminal surface that allows adhesion and further release of Biolimus A9 (Biosensors Europe SA, Morges, Switzerland). METHODS A total of 182 patients (183 lesions) were randomized into a 1:1:1 ratio for treatment with BFD standard dose (BFD) or BFD low dose (BFD-LD) versus first-generation paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) at 4 sites in Germany. RESULTS Baseline and procedural characteristics were well matched. At 4-month angiographic follow-up (Cohort 1, n = 75), in-stent late lumen loss (LLL) was significantly lower with BFD and BFD-LD versus PES (0.08 and 0.12 mm vs. 0.37 mm, respectively; p < 0.0001 for BFD vs. PES, and p = 0.002 for BFD-LD vs. PES). At 12 months (Cohort 2, n = 107), in-stent LLL (primary endpoint) was 0.17 mm in BFD versus 0.35 mm in PES (p = 0.001 for noninferiority; p = 0.11 for superiority); however, the BFD-LD (0.22 mm) did not reach noninferiority (p = 0.21). At 5 years (175 of 182), there were no significant differences in major adverse cardiac events (23.8%, 26.4%, and 20.3%) and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (10.8%, 13.4%, and 10.2%) for BFD, BFD-LD, and PES, respectively; also, there was no definite/probable stent thrombosis reported. CONCLUSIONS The BFD, but not the BFD-LD, demonstrated noninferiority versus PES in terms of in-stent LLL, a surrogate of neointimal hyperplasia, at 12-month follow-up. At 5 years, clinical event rates were similar, without occurrence of stent thrombosis in all groups. (BioFreedom FIM Clinical Trial; NCT01172119) (J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2016; 9:51-64) (C) 2016 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available