4.6 Article

Citizen science in monitoring food environments: a qualitative collective case study of stakeholders' experiences during the Local Environment Action on Food project in Alberta, Canada

Journal

BMC PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13030-1

Keywords

Citizen science; Health promotion; Community participation; Child health; Food; Nutrition policy

Funding

  1. Alberta Innovates Health Solutions Cancer Prevention Research Opportunity [201500846]
  2. Stollery Children's Hospital Foundation
  3. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  4. Public Health Agency of Canada
  5. Alberta Innovates -Health Solutions [CPP 137909]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study explored stakeholders' experiences of the LEAF project in Alberta, Canada, which uses citizen science to monitor food environments. Analysis revealed two main themes: relationship building and process factors. Communities used strategies like engaging the right people, treading lightly, and reaching a consensus to navigate relationship building challenges. The study recommends a web application for independent community food environment assessments to sustain citizen involvement and promote healthy food environments.
Background Citizen science bears potential to build a comprehensive view of global food environments and create a broader discussion about how to improve them. Despite its potential, citizen science has not been fully utilised in food environment research. Thus, we sought to explore stakeholders' experiences of the Local Environment Action on Food (LEAF) project, a community-based intervention that employs a citizen science approach to monitoring food environments. Methods We used a qualitative collective case study design to explore citizen science through the LEAF process in seven communities in Alberta, Canada. Data generating strategies included semi-structured interviews with citizen scientists (n = 26), document review of communities' Mini Nutrition Report Cards (n = 7), and researcher observation. Data were analyzed in a multi-phase process, using Charmaz's constant comparison analysis strategy. Results Analysis revealed two main themes: relationship building and process factors. Communities used three interconnected strategies, engaging the right people, treading lightly, and reaching a consensus, to navigate the vital but challenging relationship building process. Process factors, which were influences on the LEAF process and relationship building, included the local context, flexibility in the LEAF process, and turnover among LEAF community groups. Conclusion Citizen science through the LEAF project supported the creation and application of food environment evidence: it enabled residents to collect and interpret local food environment data, develop realistic recommendations for change, and provided them with an evidence-based advocacy tool to support the implementation of these recommendations. We recommend a web application that enables independent community food environment assessments. Such a tool could stimulate and sustain citizen involvement in food environment efforts, helping to build the necessary evidence base and promote the creation of healthy food environments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available