4.5 Article

Exploring why patients in heroin-assisted treatment are getting incarcerated-a qualitative study

Journal

BMC PSYCHIATRY
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12888-022-03814-5

Keywords

Opioid use disorder; Criminal offense; Crime; Imprisonment; Delinquency; Opioid agonist treatment; Qualitative study; Interview

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that patients with a history of incarcerations during heroin-assisted treatment were mainly incarcerated due to cocaine use, impaired functioning, and financial constraints. These factors often co-occurred and contributed to the likelihood of incarceration. Many patients were imprisoned primarily because they were unable to pay fines resulting from minor offenses.
Background Heroin-assisted treatment has proven effective in reducing criminal offenses in opioid dependent individuals. Few studies attempted to explain the observed crime reduction and the reasons why these patients keep offending and getting incarcerated have to date not been explored. Methods Patients with a history of incarcerations during the time of participating in heroin-assisted treatment (n = 22) were invited to a semi-structured, narrative interview. Findings were evaluated with Mayring's qualitative content analysis framework. Additionally, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment test and the multiple-choice vocabulary intelligence test used to assess cognitive impairment and premorbid intelligence levels. Results Three main categories emerged in patients' narratives on their incarcerations: cocaine use, impaired functioning, and financial constraints. Lifetime prevalence of cocaine use disorder was 95.5% and their cocaine use often led to patients getting incarcerated. Impaired functioning mainly constituted the inability to receive and open mail. Financial constraints led to incarcerations in lieu of payment in 16 participants (72.7%). Categories overlapped notably and often occurred in close temporal proximity. A fourth category on the likelihood of getting incarcerated again in the future was inhomogeneous and ranged from the strong conviction to complete rejection of the scenario. Average premorbid intelligence levels were found, whereas the cognitive assessment suggested severe cognitive impairment in our sample. Conclusion Participants mainly reported to have committed minor offenses and not being able to pay for resulting fines. The resulting prison sentences are an unconvincing practice from a medical and economic perspective alike. Public expenditure and the interruptions of the continuum of care could be reduced by legislatively protecting these marginalised patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available