4.4 Article

General and comparative self-rated health in chronic stroke: an important outcome measure for health professionals

Journal

BMC NEUROLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12883-022-02592-7

Keywords

Self-rated health; Health assessment; Stroke; Affective symptoms; Motor disorders; Physical activity

Funding

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior [001]
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais [PPM-00496-17, APQ-00736-20]
  3. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico [302494/20189]
  4. Pro-reitoria de Pesquisa da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais [03/2020]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The evaluation of self-rated health (SRH) differs in individuals with chronic post-stroke disabilities depending on the types of questions and health/functioning domains.
Background After a stroke, several aspects of health and function may influence how individuals perceive their own health. However, self-rated health (SRH), as well as its relationship with functioning, has been little explored in individuals with stroke. The aims of this study were to determine how individuals with chronic post-stroke disabilities evaluate their health, considering general, time- and age-comparative SRH questions and to investigate whether SRH measures would be influenced by the following health and functioning domains: mental/physical functions and personal factors. Methods Sixty-nine individuals with chronic post-stroke disabilities answered the three types of SRH questions and were assessed regarding depressive symptoms (emotional function domain), physical activity levels (physical function domain), and engagement in physical activity practice (personal factor domain). Subjects were divided into the following groups: good/poor for the general SRH question; better, similar, and worse for both time- and age-comparative questions. Between-group differences in the three domains for each SRH question were investigated (alpha = 5%). Results General SRH was rated as good by 73% of the participants. Time- and age-comparative SRH was rated as better by 36% and 47% and as similar by 31% and 28% of the subjects, respectively. Significant between-group differences in emotional function were found for both the general and age-comparative questions. For the time-comparative question, significant differences were only observed for physical function. Conclusion SRH evaluation differed in individuals with chronic post-stroke disabilities according to the types of questions and health/functioning domains.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available