4.8 Article

Combining faecal immunochemical testing with blood test results for colorectal cancer risk stratification: a consecutive cohort of 16,604 patients presenting to primary care

Journal

BMC MEDICINE
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12916-022-02272-w

Keywords

Colorectal neoplasms; Predictive value of tests; Primary health care; Triage; Faecal immunochemical tests; Full blood count

Funding

  1. Cancer Research UK (CR-UK) through the Cancer Research UK Oxford Centre [C5255/A18085]
  2. Oxford Centre for Early Cancer Detection (OxCODE)
  3. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
  4. NIHR Oxford Medtech and In-Vitro Diagnostics Co-operative
  5. NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

FIT is a highly sensitive tool for screening colorectal cancer and can identify high-risk individuals with lower risk symptoms in primary care. Combining blood test results with FIT does not appear to improve the screening for colorectal cancer compared to using FIT alone.
Background Faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) are used to triage primary care patients with symptoms that could be caused by colorectal cancer for referral to colonoscopy. The aim of this study was to determine whether combining FIT with routine blood test results could improve the performance of FIT in the primary care setting. Methods Results of all consecutive FITs requested by primary care providers between March 2017 and December 2020 were retrieved from the Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. Demographic factors (age, sex), reason for referral, and results of blood tests within 90 days were also retrieved. Patients were followed up for incident colorectal cancer in linked hospital records. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of FIT alone, FIT paired with blood test results, and several multivariable FIT models, were compared. Results One hundred thirty-nine colorectal cancers were diagnosed (0.8%). Sensitivity and specificity of FIT alone at a threshold of 10 mu g Hb/g were 92.1 and 91.5% respectively. Compared to FIT alone, blood test results did not improve the performance of FIT. Pairing blood test results with FIT increased specificity but decreased sensitivity. Multivariable models including blood tests performed similarly to FIT alone. Conclusions FIT is a highly sensitive tool for identifying higher risk individuals presenting to primary care with lower risk symptoms. Combining blood test results with FIT does not appear to lead to better discrimination for colorectal cancer than using FIT alone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available