Journal
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages -Publisher
BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07829-2
Keywords
Access to healthcare; Rural health; Qualitative methods
Categories
Funding
- Center for Biomedical Research Excellence award from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institute of Health [P20GM130418]
- University of Montana Burnham Population Health Fellowship
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study investigates the barriers to healthcare access in rural areas. The findings reveal that there is friction between patients' rural identities and healthcare systems, cultural differences have an impact on healthcare access, communication between healthcare providers is problematic, time and resource constraints disproportionately affect rural health systems, and profits are prioritized over addressing barriers to healthcare access. Therefore, each dimension of access needs to be monitored in order to improve patient experiences and outcomes for rural residents.
Background Ensuring access to healthcare is a complex, multi-dimensional health challenge. Since the inception of the coronavirus pandemic, this challenge is more pressing. Some dimensions of access are difficult to quantify, namely characteristics that influence healthcare services to be both acceptable and appropriate. These link to a patient's acceptance of services that they are to receive and ensuring appropriate fit between services and a patient's specific healthcare needs. These dimensions of access are particularly evident in rural health systems where additional structural barriers make accessing healthcare more difficult. Thus, it is important to examine healthcare access barriers in rural-specific areas to understand their origin and implications for resolution. Methods We used qualitative methods and a convenience sample of healthcare providers who currently practice in the rural US state of Montana. Our sample included 12 healthcare providers from diverse training backgrounds and specialties. All were decision-makers in the development or revision of patients' treatment plans. Semi-structured interviews and content analysis were used to explore barriers-appropriateness and acceptability-to healthcare access in their patient populations. Our analysis was both deductive and inductive and focused on three analytic domains: cultural considerations, patient-provider communication, and provider-provider communication. Member checks ensured credibility and trustworthiness of our findings. Results Five key themes emerged from analysis: 1) a friction exists between aspects of patients' rural identities and healthcare systems; 2) facilitating access to healthcare requires application of and respect for cultural differences; 3) communication between healthcare providers is systematically fragmented; 4) time and resource constraints disproportionately harm rural health systems; and 5) profits are prioritized over addressing barriers to healthcare access in the US. Conclusions Inadequate access to healthcare is an issue in the US, particularly in rural areas. Rural healthcare consumers compose a hard-to-reach patient population. Too few providers exist to meet population health needs, and fragmented communication impairs rural health systems' ability to function. These issues exacerbate the difficulty of ensuring acceptable and appropriate delivery of healthcare services, which compound all other barriers to healthcare access for rural residents. Each dimension of access must be monitored to improve patient experiences and outcomes for rural Americans.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available