4.7 Article

Differential regulation of intramuscular fat and abdominal fat deposition in chickens

Journal

BMC GENOMICS
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-022-08538-0

Keywords

Abdominal fat; Chicken; Intramuscular fat; Transcriptomics; WGCNA

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32172723]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition [2004DA125184G2109]
  3. Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program [ASTIP-IAS04]
  4. Earmarked Fund for Modern Agro-Industry Technology Research System [CARS-41]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By studying the deposition of IMF and AF in chicken meat, the study revealed the regulatory mechanisms of crucial genes and signaling pathways in their deposition, providing a theoretical basis for producing high-quality broilers.
Background Chicken intramuscular fat (IMF) content is closely related to meat quality and performance, such as tenderness and flavor. Abdominal fat (AF) in chickens is one of the main waste products at slaughter. Excessive AF reduces feed efficiency and carcass quality. Results To analyze the differential deposition of IMF and AF in chickens, gene expression profiles in the breast muscle (BM) and AF tissues of 18 animals were analyzed by differential expression analysis and weighted co-expression network analysis. The results showed that IMF deposition in BM was associated with pyruvate and citric acid metabolism through GAPDH, LDHA, GPX1, GBE1, and other genes. In contrast, AF deposition was related to acetyl CoA and glycerol metabolism through FABP1, ELOVL6, SCD, ADIPOQ, and other genes. Carbohydrate metabolism plays an essential role in IMF deposition, and fatty acid and glycerol metabolism regulate AF deposition. Conclusion This study elucidated the molecular mechanism governing IMF and AF deposition through crucial genes and signaling pathways and provided a theoretical basis for producing high-quality broilers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available