4.8 Article

Long-term effect of perfluorooctanoic acid on the anammox system based on metagenomics: Performance, sludge characteristic and microbial community dynamic

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 351, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127002

Keywords

Perfluorooctanoic acid; Anaerobic ammonium oxidation; Microbial community; Metagenomics; Nitrogen metabolism

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52060003]
  2. Pearl River Xijiang River Economic Belt Development Institute [ZX2020001]
  3. Key Laboratory of Ecology of Rare and En-dangered Species and Environmental Protection (Guangxi Normal University), Ministry of Education [ERESEP2021Z09]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effects of PFOA on the nitrogen removal performance, microbial community, and functional genes in an ABR were investigated. The results showed that increasing PFOA concentration decreased the removal efficiencies of NH4+-N and NO2--N, as well as the relative abundance of specific microbial species and the expression of anammox genes in the sludge.
The effects of PFOA on the nitrogen removal performance, microbial community and functional genes of anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox) sludge in an anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) were investigated. The removal efficiencies of ammonia nitrogen (NH4+-N) and nitrite (NO2--N) decreased from 93.90 +/- 3.64% and 98.6 +/- 1.84% to 77.81 +/- 6.86% and 77.96 & PLUSMN; 1.88% when PFOA increased from 5 mg/L to 50 mg/L, respectively. X-ray photoelectron spectra analysis of the anammox sludge showed the presence of both C-F and CaF2 forms of F. Metagenomics analysis of the anammox sludge in the first compartment illustrated that the relative abundance of Ca.Brocadia and Ca.Kuenenia decreased from 22.21% and 5.61% to 2.11% and 2.84% at 50 mg/L PFOA compared with that without PFOA. In addition, the nitrogen metabolism pathway showed that adding 50 mg/L PFOA decreased the expression of HzsB, HzsC, and Hdh (anammox genes) by 0.096%, 0.05% and 0.062%, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available