4.5 Article

Uniform inference in high-dimensional Gaussian graphical models

Journal

BIOMETRIKA
Volume 110, Issue 1, Pages 51-68

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/biomet/asac030

Keywords

Conditional independence; Double/debiased machine learning; Gaussian graphical model; High-dimensional setting; Post-selection inference; Square-root lasso

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the uniform inference on high-dimensional graphical models under approximate sparsity, and demonstrates how to estimate and recover the graphical models using modern machine learning methods. The paper establishes uniform estimation rates and sparsity guarantees for the square-root lasso estimator in a random design, and demonstrates its good performance through comprehensive simulations.
Graphical models have become a popular tool for representing dependencies within large sets of variables and are crucial for representing causal structures. We provide results for uniform inference on high-dimensional graphical models, in which the number of target parameters d is potentially much larger than the sample size, under approximate sparsity. Our results highlight how graphical models can be estimated and recovered using modern machine learning methods in high-dimensional complex settings. To construct simultaneous confidence regions on many target parameters, it is crucial to have sufficiently fast estimation rates of the nuisance functions. In this context, we establish uniform estimation rates and sparsity guarantees for the square-root lasso estimator in a random design under approximate sparsity conditions. These might be of independent interest for related problems in high dimensions. We also demonstrate in a comprehensive simulation study that our procedure has good small sample properties in comparison to existing methods, and we present two empirical applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available