4.6 Article

Analysis of single channel electroencephalographic signals for visual creativity: A pilot study

Journal

BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING AND CONTROL
Volume 75, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2022.103542

Keywords

EEG; Visual creativity; Creativity assessment; Classification; Neurosky

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the potential of using EEG technology to assess levels of visual creativity. Through various tasks and analysis methods, the study achieved classification results for different levels of creativity and found that chaos analysis showed higher accuracy in classification.
ABS T R A C T Analysis of creativity has important clinical applications in studying neurological disorders. Among the available tools, the simplest and the most portable device is the EEG headset. In this study we explore the potential of a single channel EEG to assess varying levels of Visual Creativity via sketching. Three tasks requiring different levels of creativity are designed: Max Creative(TMC)-sketching, Less Creative(TLC)-repetitive geometric patterns, and Nil Creative(TNC)-tally marks. Normalized and artifact-filtered EEG signals are used for analyses. Three different types of analysis are carried out using the features extracted from three different paradigms: (1) Chaos Analysis, (2) Distribution Analysis, and (3) Statistical Analysis. The 4-class classification scenario (Rest vs TMC vs TLC vs TNC) is compared with LSTM which is the popular technique for 1D signal. Mean accuracy is reported over 5-fold cross-validation over 10 runs. Among various feature and classifier combinations, peak performances are seen in the following scenarios. In 4-class classification, chaos features result in a peak mean accuracy of 52% while other features show significantly less accuracy. LSTM for 4-class classification results in only 38% accuracy in the current setting. When levels of creativity(TMC vs TLC vs TNC) are analyzed, Hjorth mobility and complexity, LLE and distribution features result in 45% accuracy. As expected, it is observed that Rest(R) is distinguished from Non-Rest with a mean accuracy > 90% using Standard deviation, MAD and LLE, individually. However, distribution-based features result in 69-74% accuracy. It is observed that chaos analysis results in a higher accuracy for the classes considered.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available