4.6 Article

A new deep technique using R-CNN model and L1NSR feature selection for brain MRI classification

Journal

BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING AND CONTROL
Volume 75, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2022.103625

Keywords

R-CNN; Deep features; L1NSR feature selection; MRI; Brain tumor detection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a new deep learning-based approach for automatic brain tumor detection using MRI images. The approach achieves high classification accuracies for both 2-class and 4-class datasets by extracting deep features from MR images and utilizing a novel feature selection algorithm.
One of the most dangerous diseases in the world is brain tumors. After the brain tumor destroys healthy tissues in the brain, it multiplies abnormally, causing an increase in the internal pressure in the skull. If this condition is not diagnosed early, it can lead to death. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a diagnostic method frequently used in soft tissues with successful results. This study presented a new deep learning-based approach, which automatically detects brain tumors using Magnetic Resonance (MR) images. Convolutional and fully connected layers of a new Residual-CNN (R-CNN) model trained from scratch were used to extract deep features from MR images. The representation power of the deep feature set was increased with the features extracted from all convolutional layers. Among the deep features extracted, the 100 features with the highest distinctiveness were selected with a new multi-level feature selection algorithm named L1NSR. The best performance in the classification stage was obtained by using the SVM algorithm with the Gaussian kernel. The proposed approach was evaluated on two separate data sets composed of 2-class (healthy and tumor) and 4-class (glioma tumor, meningioma tumor, pituitary tumor, and healthy) datasets. Besides, the proposed approach was compared with other state-of-the-art approaches using the respective datasets. The best classification accuracies for 2-class and 4-class datasets were 98.8% and 96.6%, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available