4.8 Article

Flexible patch with printable and antibacterial conductive hydrogel electrodes for accelerated wound healing

Journal

BIOMATERIALS
Volume 285, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121479

Keywords

Electrical stimulation; Wound healing; Conductive hydrogel; Antibacteria

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [EB024403, EB023052, GM126831, HL140618]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A flexible electrical patch (ePatch) made with conductive hydrogel as electrodes was developed to improve wound management. The ePatch showed significant benefits in promoting wound re-epithelization, enhancing angiogenesis, mediating immune response, and preventing infection. In vitro and in vivo studies demonstrated the effectiveness of electrical stimulation in promoting cell proliferation and migration, and in accelerating wound closure.
Electrical stimulation can facilitate wound healing with high efficiency and limited side effects. However, current electrical stimulation devices have poor conformability with wounds due to their bulky nature and the rigidity of electrodes utilized. Here, a flexible electrical patch (ePatch) made with conductive hydrogel as electrodes to improve wound management was reported. The conductive hydrogel was synthesized using silver nanowire (AgNW) and methacrylated alginate (MAA), with the former chosen as the electrode material considering its antibacterial properties, and the latter used due to its clinical suitability in wound healing. The composition of the hydrogel was optimized to enable printing on medical-grade patches for personalized wound treatment. The ePatch was shown to promote re-epithelization, enhance angiogenesis, mediate immune response, and prevent infection development in the wound microenvironment. In vitro studies indicated an elevated secretion of growth factors with enhanced cell proliferation and migration ability in response to electrical stimulation. An in vivo study in the Sprague-Dawley rat model revealed a rapid wound closure within 7 days compared to 20 days of usual healing process in rodents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available