4.3 Article

BRAK and APRIL as novel biomarkers for ovarian tumors

Journal

BIOMARKERS IN MEDICINE
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages 717-729

Publisher

FUTURE MEDICINE LTD
DOI: 10.2217/bmm-2021-1014

Keywords

APRIL; TNFSF13; biomarker; BRAK; CXCL14; CA-125; ovarian tumor

Funding

  1. Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute - Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [HI18C2047]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea - Korea government [2017R1A2B2011728]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2017R1A2B2011728] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BRAK and APRIL are good candidates for ovarian tumor biomarkers, showing excellent sensitivity and specificity in differentiating healthy patients from ovarian tumor patients.
Aims: To evaluate BRAK and APRIL in serum samples from healthy patients and an ovarian tumor group and analyze their effective value as biomarkers. Materials & methods: BRAK and APRIL were measured in 197 serum samples including 34 healthy controls, 48 patients with benign ovarian cysts and 115 patients with ovarian cancer, and the best statistical cutoff values were calculated. Then, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for selected cutoff points were assessed. Results: The healthy control group had statistically significant higher BRAK and lower APRIL than the ovarian tumor group. BRAK was excellent for differentiating healthy patients from patients with ovarian tumors, showing area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.983, 98.16% sensitivity and 100% specificity. When BRAK was combined with APRIL and CA-125, it also played a role in distinguishing benign cysts from malignancies with area under the curve 0.864, 81.74% sensitivity and 79.17% specificity. Conclusions: BRAK and APRIL are good candidates for ovarian tumor biomarkers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available