4.4 Article

Managing biological invasions: the cost of inaction

Journal

BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages 1927-1946

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-022-02755-0

Keywords

InvaCost; Invasive alien species; Logistic growth; Socioeconomic impacts; Prevention and biosecurity; Long-term management

Funding

  1. French National Research Agency [ANR-14-CE02-0021]
  2. BNP-Paribas Foundation Climate Initiative
  3. AXA Research Fund Chair of Invasion Biology
  4. AlienScenarios project - BiodivERsA
  5. Kuwait Foundation for the Advancement of Sciences (KFAS) [PR1914SM-01]
  6. Gulf University for Science and Technology (GUST) internal seed fund [234597]
  7. Fonds de recherche du Quebec-nature et technologies B3X fellowship
  8. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  9. PRIME programme of the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD)
  10. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study quantifies the cost of inaction and highlights the importance of timely management of invasive alien species. The results show that rapid management interventions drastically minimize costs, while any delay in management can result in substantial losses.
Ecological and socioeconomic impacts from biological invasions are rapidly escalating worldwide. While effective management underpins impact mitigation, such actions are often delayed, insufficient or entirely absent. Presently, management delays emanate from a lack of monetary rationale to invest at early invasion stages, which precludes effective prevention and eradication. Here, we provide such rationale by developing a conceptual model to quantify the cost of inaction, i.e., the additional expenditure due to delayed management, under varying time delays and management efficiencies. Further, we apply the model to management and damage cost data from a relatively data-rich genus (Aedes mosquitoes). Our model demonstrates that rapid management interventions following invasion drastically minimise costs. We also identify key points in time that differentiate among scenarios of timely, delayed and severely delayed management intervention. Any management action during the severely delayed phase results in substantial losses (>50% of the potential maximum loss). For Aedes spp., we estimate that the existing management delay of 55 years led to an additional total cost of approximately $ 4.57 billion (14% of the maximum cost), compared to a scenario with management action only seven years prior (< 1% of the maximum cost). Moreover, we estimate that in the absence of management action, long-term losses would have accumulated to US$ 32.31 billion, or more than seven times the observed inaction cost. These results highlight the need for more timely management of invasive alien species-either pre-invasion, or as soon as possible after detection-by demonstrating how early investments rapidly reduce long-term economic impacts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available