4.7 Article

Metapone: a Bioconductor package for joint pathway testing for untargeted metabolomics data

Journal

BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 38, Issue 14, Pages 3662-3664

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac364

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R21ES032117, P30ES019776, 1R01GM124061]
  2. Shenzhen Research Institute of Big Data and the University Development Fund of CUHK-Shenzhen

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article introduces an innovative R/Bioconductor package for pathway enrichment testing of untargeted metabolomics data. The package addresses the matching uncertainty between data features and metabolites, and allows for the simultaneous analysis of positive and negative ion mode LC/MS data.
Motivation: Testing for pathway enrichment is an important aspect in the analysis of untargeted metabolomics data. Due to the unique characteristics of untargeted metabolomics data, some key issues have not been fully addressed in existing pathway testing algorithms: (i) matching uncertainty between data features and metabolites; (ii) lacking of method to analyze positive mode and negative mode liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC/MS) data simultaneously on the same set of subjects; (iii) the incompleteness of pathways in individual software packages. Results: We developed an innovative R/Bioconductor package: metabolic pathway testing with positive and negative mode data (metapone), which can perform two novel statistical tests that take matching uncertainty into consideration-(i) a weighted gene set enrichment analysis-type test and (ii) a permutation-based weighted hypergeometric test. The package is capable of combining positive- and negative-ion mode results in a single testing scheme. For comprehensiveness, the built-in pathways were manually curated from three sources: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes, Mummichog and The Small Molecule Pathway Database.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available