4.4 Review

Enhancing health span: muscle stem cells and hormesis

Journal

BIOGERONTOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages 151-167

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10522-022-09949-y

Keywords

Stem cells; Muscle stem cells; Cell proliferation; Hormesis; Sarcopenia; Aging

Funding

  1. US Air Force [AFOSR FA9550-19-1-0413]
  2. ExxonMobil Foundation [S18200000000256]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper provides a detailed identification and assessment of hormetic dose responses in animal model muscle stem cells, emphasizing on cell proliferation, differentiation, and enhancing resilience to inflammatory stresses. Hormetic dose responses were observed following administration of a broad range of agents, including dietary supplements, pharmaceuticals, endogenous ligands, environmental contaminants, and physical agents.
Sarcopenia is a significant public health and medical concern confronting the elderly. Considerable research is being directed to identify ways in which the onset and severity of sarcopenia may be delayed/minimized. This paper provides a detailed identification and assessment of hormetic dose responses in animal model muscle stem cells, with particular emphasis on cell proliferation, differentiation, and enhancing resilience to inflammatory stresses and how this information may be useful in preventing sarcopenia. Hormetic dose responses were observed following administration of a broad range of agents, including dietary supplements (e.g., resveratrol), pharmaceuticals (e.g., dexamethasone), endogenous ligands (e.g., tumor necrosis factor alpha), environmental contaminants (e.g., cadmium) and physical agents (e.g., low level laser). The paper assesses both putative mechanisms of hormetic responses in muscle stem cells, and potential therapeutic implications and application(s) of hormetic frameworks for slowing muscle loss and reduced functionality during the aging process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available