4.7 Article

Automated location of steel truss bridge damage using machine learning and raw strain sensor data

Journal

AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION
Volume 138, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104249

Keywords

Structural health monitoring; Damage location; Railway steel bridge; Machine learning; Neural network; Feature selection; Timeseries

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a method of automatically analyzing raw monitoring data using machine learning classification tools to detect damage in steel truss railway bridges. The results indicate that the method can achieve high accuracy in damage detection and is suitable for structural health monitoring.
Strategic major infrastructure ageing requires structural health monitoring usage to avoid critical safety issues and disasters. Machine Learning can be a valuable tool to automate the process of analysing raw monitoring data. Usually, frequency domain damage-sensitive features are extracted with data pre-processing procedures; thus these features are used as input for classification or regression problems. This paper describes a method of locating damage in steel truss railway bridges through machine learning classification tools, enabling automatic analysis of raw strain sensors signals without any pre-processing or preliminary feature extraction. Data were generated by simulating different damage scenarios with a finite element software, and then were processed by two machine learning classification tools: (a) the K-nearest Neighbours was adopted with the Dynamic Time Warping algorithm metric to select the most informative features; (b) a model suitable for high-dimensional data analysis, known as the Convolutional Neural Network, was then trained to classify strain sensors time series. The results indicate that the method applied can detect damages with an accuracy of 93% and is suitable for structural health monitoring.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available