4.7 Article

The Type Icn SN 2021csp: Implications for the Origins of the Fastest Supernovae and the Fates of Wolf-Rayet Stars

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 927, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac478e

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [AST-2034437]
  2. Caltech
  3. IPAC
  4. Weizmann Institute for Science
  5. Oskar Klein Center (OKC) at Stockholm University
  6. University of Maryland
  7. Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron
  8. Humboldt University
  9. TANGO Consortium of Taiwan
  10. University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee
  11. Trinity College Dublin
  12. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories
  13. IN2P3, France
  14. NSF [1106171]
  15. Heising-Simons Foundation [12540303]
  16. UK Science and Technology Facilities Council
  17. European Organisation for Astronomical Research in the Southern Hemisphere under ESO programs [106.21U2, 106.216C]
  18. W. M. Keck Foundation
  19. G.R.E.A. T. research environment - Vetenskapsradet, the Swedish Research Council [2016-06012]
  20. WennerGren Foundation
  21. David and Lucille Packard Foundation
  22. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [759194-USNAC]
  23. Benoziyo Prize Postdoctoral Fellowship
  24. Bengier-Winslow-Robertson Fellowship
  25. EU funding under Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [H2020-MSCA-IF-2018-842471]
  26. Marie Sklodowska-Curie Individual Fellowship within the Horizon 2020 European Union (EU) Framework Programme for Research and Innovation [H2020-MSCA-IF-2017-794467]
  27. GROWTH project - NSF [1545949]
  28. Christopher R. Redlich Fund
  29. Miller Institute for Basic Research in Science
  30. EU via ERC grant [725161]
  31. ISF GW excellence center
  32. IMOS space infrastructure grant
  33. BSF/Transformative
  34. GIF grants
  35. Benoziyo Endowment Fund for the Advancement of Science
  36. Deloro Institute for Advanced Research in Space and Optics
  37. Veronika A. Rabl Physics Discretionary Fund
  38. Minerva
  39. Yeda-Sela
  40. Schwartz/Reisman Collaborative Science Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present observations of SN 2021csp, a newly identified type of supernova with unique carbon features and fast-evolving characteristics. The results suggest that its origin may be distinct from classical supernovae and more similar to other fast-evolving interacting transients. Possible progenitor scenarios are discussed.
We present observations of SN 2021csp, the second example of a newly identified type of supernova (SN) hallmarked by strong, narrow, P Cygni carbon features at early times (Type Icn). The SN appears as a fast and luminous blue transient at early times, reaching a peak absolute magnitude of -20 within 3 days due to strong interaction between fast SN ejecta (v approximate to 30,000 km s(-1)) and a massive, dense, fast-moving C/O wind shed by the WC-like progenitor months before explosion. The narrow-line features disappear from the spectrum 10-20 days after explosion and are replaced by a blue continuum dominated by broad Fe features, reminiscent of Type Ibn and IIn supernovae and indicative of weaker interaction with more extended H/He-poor material. The transient then abruptly fades similar to 60 days post-explosion when interaction ceases. Deep limits at later phases suggest minimal heavy-element nucleosynthesis, a low ejecta mass, or both, and imply an origin distinct from that of classical Type Ic SNe. We place SN 2021csp in context with other fast-evolving interacting transients, and discuss various progenitor scenarios: an ultrastripped progenitor star, a pulsational pair-instability eruption, or a jet-driven fallback SN from a Wolf-Rayet (W-R) star. The fallback scenario would naturally explain the similarity between these events and radio-loud fast transients, and suggests a picture in which most stars massive enough to undergo a W-R phase collapse directly to black holes at the end of their lives.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available