4.6 Article

A Coronagraph with a Sub-λ/D Inner Working Angle and a Moderate Spectral Bandwidth

Journal

ASTRONOMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 163, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac658a

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a new coronagraphic system that can achieve a small inner working angle and wide spectral bandwidth to enhance the detectability of Earth-like planets around G- or K-type main-sequence stars.
Future high-contrast imaging spectroscopy with a large segmented telescope will be able to detect atmospheric molecules of Earth-like planets around G- or K-type main-sequence stars. Increasing the number of target planets will require a coronagraph with a small inner working angle (IWA), and wide spectral bandwidth is required if we enhance a variety of detectable atmospheric molecules. To satisfy these requirements, in this paper, we present a coronagraphic system that provides an IWA less than 1 lambda (0)/D over a moderate wavelength band, where lambda (0) is the design-center wavelength and D denotes the full width of the rectangular aperture included in the telescope aperture. A performance simulation shows that the proposed system approximately achieves a contrast below 10(-10) at 1 lambda (0)/D over the wavelengths of 650-750 nm. In addition, this system has a core throughput >= 10% at input separation angles of similar to 0.7-1.4 lambda (0)/D; to reduce telescope time, we need prior information on the target's orbit by other observational methods to a precision higher than the width of the field of view. For some types of aberration including tilt aberration, the proposed system has a sensitivity less than ever-proposed coronagraphs that have IWAs of approximately 1 lambda (0)/D. In future observations of Earth-like planets, the proposed coronagraphic system may serve as a supplementary coronagraphic system dedicated to achieving an extremely small IWA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available