4.8 Article

Elevated temperature increases carbon and nitrogen fluxes between phytoplankton and heterotrophic bacteria through physical attachment

Journal

ISME JOURNAL
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages 641-650

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2016.156

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. COMITE project by Spanish National Investigation+Development+Innovation (I+D+I)
  2. Basque Government
  3. 'Juan de la Cierva' fellowship from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Education
  4. Marie Curie Reintegration Grant (FP7) [268331]
  5. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation Marine Microbiology Initiative grant [3302]
  6. Department of Energy's Genome Sciences Program grant [SCW1039]
  7. US Department of Energy at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [DE-AC52-07NA27344]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantifying the contribution of marine microorganisms to carbon and nitrogen cycles and their response to predicted ocean warming is one of the main challenges of microbial oceanography. Here we present a single-cell NanoSIMS isotope analysis to quantify C and N uptake by free-living and attached phytoplankton and heterotrophic bacteria, and their response to short-term experimental warming of 4 degrees C. Elevated temperature increased total C fixation by over 50%, a small but significant fraction of which was transferred to heterotrophs within 12 h. Cell-to-cell attachment doubled the secondary C uptake by heterotrophic bacteria and increased secondary N incorporation by autotrophs by 68%. Warming also increased the abundance of phytoplankton with attached heterotrophs by 80%, and promoted C transfer from phytoplankton to bacteria by 17% and N transfer from bacteria to phytoplankton by 50%. Our results indicate that phytoplankton-bacteria attachment provides an ecological advantage for nutrient incorporation, suggesting a mutualistic relationship that appears to be enhanced by temperature increases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available