4.6 Article

Thermoelectric coolers for high-power-density 3D electronics heat management

Journal

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
Volume 120, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0088129

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. center for 3D Ferroelectric Microelectronics (3DFeM), an Energy Frontier Research Center - U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences Energy Frontier Research Centers program [DE-SC0021118]
  2. Center for Energy Harvesting Materials and Systems
  3. Office of Naval Research [N00014-20-1-2602]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Future advancements in 3D electronics rely on robust thermal management methodology. Thermoelectric coolers (TECs) are solid-state heat pumping devices that can meet the cooling requirements of emerging 3D microelectronic devices. This study provides a computational model for designing TECs for electronics cooling and validates the predictions through experiments. The results show that high cooling power density can be achieved by optimizing TE leg height and packing density.
Future advancements in three-dimensional (3D) electronics require robust thermal management methodology. Thermoelectric coolers (TECs) are reliable and solid-state heat pumping devices with high cooling capacity that can meet the requirements of emerging 3D microelectronic devices. Here, we first provide the design of TECs for electronics cooling using a computational model and then experimentally validate the main predictions. Key device parameters such as device thickness, leg density, and contact resistance were studied to understand their influence on the performance of TECs. Our results show that it is possible to achieve high cooling power density through optimization of TE leg height and packing density. Scaling of TECs is shown to provide ultra-high cooling power density.& nbsp;Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available