4.6 Article

Electrochemical performance of asymmetric device using the nickel-zinc organometallic structure

Journal

APPLIED ORGANOMETALLIC CHEMISTRY
Volume 36, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/aoc.6699

Keywords

asymmetric device; bimetallic MOFs; electrode materials; energy storage; supercapacitor

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [2020R1A2B5B01002744, 2020R1A4A1019227, 2021R1I1A3059469, 2020R1A2C1012439]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2021R1I1A3059469] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a new bimetallic metal-organic framework (BMOF) electrode was successfully developed using a solvo-hydrothermal strategy. The electrode exhibited significant capacitance and excellent energy and power densities, with good capacity retention after cycling, providing a viable approach for fabricating hybrid electrode materials for high-performance energy storage systems.
Bimetallic metal-organic frameworks (BMOFs) have developed as novel candidates for electrodes due to their high-performance energy storage applications. We attempted to develop a new three-dimensional (3D) ordered structure of nickel-zinc MOFs (NZMOF), grown in situ on carbon cloth (NZMOF/CC) using a solvo-hydrothermal strategy to increase the stored energy. A notable capacitance of 456.8 F/g was achieved for this electrode at 1 A/g. In addition, the NZMOF/CC//AC/CC assembled split-cell asymmetric supercapacitor device (SASD) achieved an excellent energy and power densities of 38.54 Wh/kg and 750 W/kg, respectively, with a capacity retention of 87.27% after 5000 cycles, which is better than that of conventional supercapacitors. Additionally, this study is easy and controllable, providing a viable approach for fabricating hybrid electrode materials for high-performance energy storage systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available