4.5 Article

Criterion to determine the wave vector range of heterodyne near-field exposure time-dependent spectrum

Journal

APPLIED OPTICS
Volume 61, Issue 16, Pages 4711-4718

Publisher

Optica Publishing Group
DOI: 10.1364/AO.452850

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61975058]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2019A1515011401]
  3. Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou [2019050001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, a criterion is proposed to determine the wave vector range for the image method of heterodyne near-field light scattering. The criterion analyzes the hologram of the particles to extract particle dynamics, and its effectiveness is verified.
Recently, image methods for measuring dynamics of nanoparticles have garnered attention; however, the low-speed frame rate of normal image sensors limits their application. Applying a low-speed detector can extract fast dynamic information by the method of an exposure time-dependent spectrum, whereas its accuracy is too sensitive to the wave vector range selection. In this paper, we present a criterion to determine the wave vector range for the image method of heterodyne near-field light scattering, where the hologram of the particles is analyzed to extract the particle dynamics. A normalized instrument factor ratio r(q) is defined, and the accuracy of results can be guaranteed when the upper limit q(up) is selected at the maximum of r(q(up)) = 1, and the lower limit q(low) is selected according to the optimal goodness of fit R-2. The experimental results verify the effectiveness of the proposed criterion. Since most image methods for nanoparticle characterizing are related to the wave vector range selection, it is believed that the idea of this criterion can be extended generally. (C) 2022 Optica Publishing Group

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available