4.7 Review

Use of red, far-red, and near-infrared light in imaging of yeasts and filamentous fungi

Journal

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 106, Issue 11, Pages 3895-3912

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-022-11967-2

Keywords

Phototoxicity; Light sensing; Fluorescent proteins; Imaging toolboxes; Live-cell imaging; High-resolution microscopy; Time-lapse microscopy

Funding

  1. University of Debrecen
  2. European Union
  3. European Regional Development Fund
  4. NKFIH [K119690, K135938]
  5. [GINOP-2.2.1-15-201700044]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The interactions between fungi and light are varied and complex, with a focus on reducing unwanted effects of illumination through the application of far-red and near-infrared light.
While phototoxicity can be a useful therapeutic modality not only for eliminating malignant cells but also in treating fungal infections, mycologists aiming to observe morphological changes or molecular events in fungi, especially when long observation periods or high light fluxes are warranted, encounter problems owed to altered regulatory pathways or even cell death caused by various photosensing mechanisms. Consequently, the ever expanding repertoire of visible fluorescent protein toolboxes and high-resolution microscopy methods designed to investigate fungi in vitro and in vivo need to comply with an additional requirement: to decrease the unwanted side effects of illumination. In addition to optimizing exposure, an obvious solution is red-shifted illumination, which, however, does not come without compromises. This review summarizes the interactions of fungi with light and the various molecular biology and technology approaches developed for exploring their functions on the molecular, cellular, and in vivo microscopic levels, and outlines the progress towards reducing phototoxicity through applying far-red and near-infrared light.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available