4.5 Article

Which is the most ergonomic mop? A comparison of three domestic mopping systems

Journal

APPLIED ERGONOMICS
Volume 100, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103669

Keywords

Occupational therapy; Housework; Musculoskeletal disorders

Funding

  1. Singapore Association of Occupational Therapists [SAOT/RG02/2015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study assessed the musculoskeletal risk factors of the upper limb during domestic floor mopping tasks and compared different mopping systems. The results showed that wet wipes had the highest repetition count and exertion rates, while the plunge mop had higher scrubbing forces, and the cotton fibre mop was perceived as the cleanest. These findings provide valuable reference for occupational therapists to provide ergonomic advice to patients with upper limb musculoskeletal conditions.
Purpose: To assess musculoskeletal risk factors (repetitions, posture, forces) of the upper limb during domestic floor mopping tasks. Methods: Two hundred women were surveyed to determine the most common mopping system, mopping patterns and type of flooring used in their homes. The biomechanical demands of the three most common mopping systems were then evaluated in the laboratory. Participants were also asked to rate their perceived levels of exertion and cleanliness of each mopping system.Results: The use of wet wipes had the highest repetition count and exertion rates during mopping and scrubbing tasks. Higher peak scrubbing forces were noted for the plunge mop. All participants found the cotton fibre mop to be the cleanest. All 3 mops had medium postural risk.Conclusion: The advantages and disadvantages of each mopping system were outlined and may be used by occupational therapists when providing ergonomic advice to patients with upper limb musculoskeletal conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available