4.8 Article

An efficient and incentive-compatible market design for energy storage participation

Journal

APPLIED ENERGY
Volume 311, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118731

Keywords

Energy storages; Market mechanism; Bidding structure; Settlement rule; Incentive compatibility

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2020YFF0305800]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper discusses the limitations of the current market mechanism for the participation of energy storage systems (ESS) and proposes a new bidding structure, clearing model, and settlement rule to incentivize honest behavior from ESS.
With the increasing penetration of renewables, energy storage systems (ESS) are becoming growingly important due to its peak-shaving ability. However, the current market mechanism is not well prepared for the participation of the ESSs. Firstly, the current bidding structure requires the ESSs to submit separate parameters for charging and discharging, but this structure is inconsistent with their operating characteristics. Secondly, the current settlement rule settles the ESSs according to time-variant locational marginal prices (LMP), but the diminishing intertemporal price spreads will encourage them to behave strategically. To this end, this paper proposes a novel bidding structure, a corresponding clearing model and a modified settlement rule: The bidding structure for the ESSs includes cost functions with respect to cycling mileages and valuation functions for ending stored energy. Thereafter the independent system operators (ISO) will manage the ESSs' state of charge (SOC) and clear the market. A settlement rule based on Vickery-Clarke-Groves (VCG) mechanism and Asymmetric Nash Bargaining theory is adopted to incentivize the ESSs to behave honestly. Numerical tests are conducted to illustrate the social welfare efficiency, incentive compatibility and computational tractability of the proposed mechanism.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available