Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.MRI/US fusion prostate biopsy in men on active surveillance: Our experience
Vito Lacetera et al.
ARCHIVIO ITALIANO DI UROLOGIA E ANDROLOGIA (2021)
TREXIT 2020: why the time to abandon transrectal prostate biopsy starts now
Jeremy Grummet et al.
PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES (2020)
Prostate Mapping for Cancer Diagnosis: The Madrid Protocol. Transperineal Prostate Biopsies Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion and Micro-Ultrasound Guided Biopsies
Moises Elias Rodriguez Socarras et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2020)
Risk of Gleason Score 3+4=7 prostate cancer upgrading at radical prostatectomy is significantly reduced by targeted versus standard biopsy
Stefano De Luca et al.
MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA (2020)
Transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Jianjian Xiang et al.
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY (2019)
MRI-guided in-bore biopsy for prostate cancer: what does the evidence say? A case series of 554 patients and a review of the current literature
Morgan Pokorny et al.
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2019)
A Systematic Review of the Existing Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 (PI-RADSv2) Literature and Subset Meta-Analysis of PI-RADSv2 Categories Stratified by Gleason Scores
Emil Jernstedt Barkovich et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY (2019)
Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate and targeted biopsy, Comparison of PIRADS and Gleason grading
Matthew Bastian-Jordan
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY (2018)
Anterior Localization of Prostate Cancer Suspicious Lesions in 1,161 Patients Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Targeted Biopsies
Sami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2018)
MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis
V Kasivisvanathan et al.
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2018)
Adoption of Prebiopsy Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Men Undergoing Prostate Biopsy in the United States
Wen Liu et al.
UROLOGY (2018)
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries
Freddie Bray et al.
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS (2018)
Does magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsy improve prostate cancer detection? A comparison of systematic, cognitive fusion and ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy
Jonathan Kam et al.
PROSTATE INTERNATIONAL (2018)
Zero hospital admissions for infection after 577 transperineal prostate biopsies using single-dose cephazolin prophylaxis
Lana Pepdjonovic et al.
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2017)
Why and Where do We Miss Significant Prostate Cancer with Multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging followed by Magnetic Resonance-guided and Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naive Men?
Martijn G. Schouten et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2017)
Comparing Three Different Techniques for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsies: A Systematic Review of In-bore versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound fusion versus Cognitive Registration. Is There a Preferred Technique?
Olivier Wegelin et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2017)
An Update of the American Urological Association White Paper on the Prevention and Treatment of the More Common Complications Related to Prostate Biopsy
Michael A. Liss et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2017)
Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study
Hashim U. Ahmed et al.
LANCET (2017)
Comparison between target magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in-gantry and cognitively directed transperineal or transrectal-guided prostate biopsies for Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 3-5 MRI lesions
Anna J. Yaxley et al.
BJU INTERNATIONAL (2017)
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3)
Mervyn Singer et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2016)
In-bore magnetic resonance-guided transrectal biopsy for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
Ely R. Felker et al.
ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY (2016)
Multifocality and Prostate Cancer Detection by Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Correlation with Whole-mount Histopathology
Jesse D. Le et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2015)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy May Enhance the Diagnostic Accuracy of Significant Prostate Cancer Detection Compared to Standard Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Ivo G. Schoots et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2015)
Comparative Analysis of Transperineal Template Saturation Prostate Biopsy Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Guidance
Jan P. Radtke et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2015)
Prospective Study of Diagnostic Accuracy Comparing Prostate Cancer Detection by Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy Versus Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging with Subsequent MR-guided Biopsy in Men Without Previous Prostate Biopsies
Morgan R. Pokorny et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2014)
Reducing infection rates after prostate biopsy
Florian M. E. Wagenlehner et al.
NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY (2014)
Influence of imaging and histological factors on prostate cancer detection and localisation on multiparametric MRI: a prospective study
Flavie Bratan et al.
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY (2013)
The Feasibility of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Targeted Biopsy Using Novel Navigation Systems to Detect Early Stage Prostate Cancer: The Preliminary Experience
Vladimir Mouraviev et al.
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY (2013)
The role of transperineal template prostate biopsies in restaging men with prostate cancer managed by active surveillance
Benjamin E. Ayres et al.
BJU INTERNATIONAL (2012)
Characterizing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Template Prostate Mapping Biopsy
Hashim Uddin Ahmed et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2011)
Complications After Prostate Biopsy: Data From SEER-Medicare
Stacy Loeb et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2011)
Risk Profiles and Treatment Patterns Among Men Diagnosed as Having Prostate Cancer and a Prostate-Specific Antigen Level Below 4.0 ng/mL
Yu-Hsuan Shao et al.
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2010)
Increasing Hospital Admission Rates for Urological Complications After Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy
Robert K. Nam et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2010)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Prostate Biopsy in Men With Repeat Negative Biopsies and Increased Prostate Specific Antigen
Thomas Hambrock et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2010)
Gleason Score and Lethal Prostate Cancer: Does 3+4=4+3?
Jennifer R. Stark et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (2009)
Incidence, risk factors and outcomes of Escherichia coli bloodstream infections in a large Canadian region
K. B. Laupland et al.
CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION (2008)
Classification of surgical complications - A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey
D Dindo et al.
ANNALS OF SURGERY (2004)
Share Paper
