4.3 Article

Regulation of Expression of Sterol Regulatory Element-binding Protein 1 in Thyroid Cancer Cells

Journal

ANTICANCER RESEARCH
Volume 42, Issue 5, Pages 2487-2493

Publisher

INT INST ANTICANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.15727

Keywords

SREBP1; galectin-3; thyroid cancer

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan [MOST-110-2314-B-195-018-MY3]
  2. MacKay Memorial Hospital [MMH-11116, MMH-E-111-08]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that the expression of SREBP1 in thyroid cancer cells is affected by various specific inhibitors, among which, Lenvatinib and a MEK inhibitor can suppress SREBP1 expression in BRAF mutant cells, while a galectin-3 inhibitor can reduce SREBP1 expression in both cells in a time- and dose-dependent manner.
Background/Aim: Expression of sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1 (SREBP1) is upregulated in thyroid cancer and associated with shorter disease-specific survival. The molecular regulatory mechanisms governing SREBP1 over-expression in thyroid cancer are still unclear. Materials and Methods: Thyroid cancer cell lines BHT-101 (with the BRAF V600E mutation) and FTC-131 (wild-type for BRAF) were treated with specific inhibitors. The expression of SREBP1 was determined at the mRNA level using quantitative real-time PCR and at the protein level using immunoblotting. Results: Lenvatinib and a MEK inhibitor, selumetinib, suppressed SREBP1 expression in BHT-101 but not FTC-133 cells. Olitigaltin, a galectin-3 inhibitor, decreased SREBP1 expression in a time-and dose-dependent manner in both cells. MK2206, an allosteric AKT inhibitor, did not change SREBP1 expression in either cell line. Conclusion: The galectin-3 inhibitor attenuates SREBP1 expression in thyroid cancer cells, likely independent of AKT phosphorylation. Lenvatinib and selumetinib decreases SREBP1 expression in the BRAF-mutant cell line BHT-101.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available