4.6 Review

Microglia and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Journal

ANNUAL REVIEW OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 45, Issue -, Pages 425-445

Publisher

ANNUAL REVIEWS
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-110920-023056

Keywords

microglia; autism; microbiome; neurodevelopmental disorders; Rett syndrome

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Stroke [R01NS119243-01A1]
  2. NIH/National Institute of Mental Health [R21MH120412-01]
  3. Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative [515305]
  4. Owens Family Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microglia, the resident immune cells of the brain, are crucial for proper brain maturation and function, and dysfunction in these cells may play a role in neurodevelopmental disorders. Additionally, there is growing interest in how the gut microbiome influences microglial biology.
Mounting evidence indicates that microglia, which are the resident immune cells of the brain, play critical roles in a diverse array of neurodevelopmental processes required for proper brain maturation and function. This evidence has ultimately led to growing speculation that microglial dysfunction may play a role in neurodevelopmental disorder (NDD) pathoetiology. In this review, we first provide an overview of how microglia mechanistically contribute to the sculpting of the developing brain and neuronal circuits. To provide an example of how disruption of microglial biology impacts NDD development, we also highlight emerging evidence that has linked microglial dysregulation to autism spectrum disorder pathogenesis. In recent years, there has been increasing interest in how the gut microbiome shapes microglial biology. In the last section of this review, we put a spotlight on this burgeoning area of microglial research and discuss how microbiota-dependent modulation of microglial biology is currently thought to influence NDD progression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available