4.6 Article

Lobectomy Provides the Best Survival for Stage I Lung Cancer Patients Despite Advanced Age

Journal

ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY
Volume 114, Issue 5, Pages 1824-+

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.03.031

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In octogenarians with pathologic stage I lung cancer, lobectomy provides better 5-year survival compared with sublobar resection regardless of the age at surgical procedure.
BACKGROUND The Lung Cancer Study Group has shown that lobectomy provides the best survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. However, as patients become older, lobectomy may not provide a survival advantage compared with sublobar resection.METHODS We analyzed the National Cancer Database for octogenarians with pathologic stage I lung cancer from 2004 to 2016. We then evaluated the patients who underwent lobectomy or sublobar (segmentectomy or wedge) resection for the treatment of cancer. We analyzed the 5-year survival rates of the groups as well as a cubic spline plot to determine age cutoffs where lobectomy does not provide improved survival.RESULTS Among the octogenarians (227134), there were 25362 (26%) who had pathologic stage I lung cancer. There were 6370 (30%) patients who had sublobar resections (segmentectomy [n = 1192] and wedge resection [n = 5178]), whereas 14 594 (70%) patients had a lobectomy. There was significantly improved survival at 5 years with lobectomy compared with sublobar resection (48.5% vs 41.1%; P < .001). The cubic spline plot provided evidence that there was no age at which sublobar resection provided survival better than or equal to lobectomy (P < .001).CONCLUSIONS In octogenarians with pathologic stage I lung cancer, lobectomy provided better 5-year survival compared with sublobar resection regardless of the age at surgical procedure. Hence, all patients with stage I cancer should be considered for a lobectomy if they are medically able to tolerate such a procedure.(Ann Thorac Surg 2022;114:1824-33)(c) 2022 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available