4.6 Article

Validation of the Wisconsin upper respiratory symptom survey-24, Chinese version

Journal

ANNALS OF MEDICINE
Volume 54, Issue 1, Pages 655-665

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2043559

Keywords

WURSS; upper respiratory infection; reliability; quality of life; common cold; validation; psychometrics

Funding

  1. China National Science and Technology Major Project [2017ZX10305501-006]
  2. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of T CM Research on Emergency [2017B030314176]
  3. Evidence-based Capacity Building Project of Traditional Chinese Medicine [2019XZZX-LG003]
  4. Collaborative innovation team project of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine [2021XK06, 2021XK49]
  5. Guangzhou Municipal Science and Technology Bureau [201803010121]
  6. National Nature Science Foundation of China, China [82004205]
  7. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, China [2020M672741, 2020T Q0137]
  8. Karolinska Institutet research funds, Sweden [202001616]
  9. Science and Technology Research Fund from Guangdong provincial hospital of Chinese medicine, China [YN2018QL08]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a Mandarin Chinese version of the WURSS-24 questionnaire (WURSS-24-C) was developed and evaluated for its reliability, validity, and minimal important difference (MID) in Chinese-speaking patients with upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs).
Background The Wisconsin upper respiratory symptom survey (WURSS) is a validated English questionnaire to evaluate the quality of life and severity of upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs). We aimed to develop a Mandarin Chinese version of WURSS-24 (WURSS-24-C) and evaluate its reliability, validity and minimal important difference (MID). Methods The WURSS-24-C was developed using the forward-backward translation procedure. People with URTIs' symptoms within 48 h of onset were recruited and asked to fill in the WURSS-24-C daily for up to 14 d. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to suggest domains. The 8-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-8) assessing general mental and physical health was used to assess validity. Reliability estimated by Cronbach's alpha and mean day-to-day change for those indicating minimal improvement as MID were evaluated. Results The WURSS-24-C was found to be acceptable, relevant, and easy to complete in cognitive debriefing interviews. A total number of 300 participants (age 28.4 +/- 9.3, female 70%) were monitored for 2500 person-days. Four domains (activity and function, systemic symptoms, nasal symptoms and throat symptoms) of the WURSS-24-C were confirmed (comparative fit index [CFI] = 0.93). The reliability of this 4-domain-structure is good (Cronbach's alphas varied from 0.849 to 0.943). Convergent validity is moderate (Pearson correlation coefficients between daily WURSS-24-C and the SF-8 were -0.780 and -0.721, for the SF-8 physical and mental health, respectively). Estimates of MID for individual items varied from -0.41 to -1.14. Conclusions The WURSS-24-C is a reliable and valid questionnaire for assessing illness-specific quality-of-life health status in Chinese-speaking patients with URTIs. Key messages The Wisconsin upper respiratory symptom survey (WURSS) series are patient-oriented questionnaire instruments assessing the quality of life and severity of upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs). The WURSS-24 was translated into Mandarin Chinese using the forward-backward translation procedure, and evaluated its validity, reliability and minimal important difference (MID) in 300 Chinese participants with URTIs. The WURSS-24 Chinese version (WURSS-24-C) seems to be a reliable and valid questionnaire for assessing illness-specific quality-of-life health status in Chinese patients with URTIs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available