4.5 Article

Individual recognition and long-term memory of inanimate interactive agents and humans in dogs

Journal

ANIMAL COGNITION
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages 1427-1442

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10071-022-01624-6

Keywords

Individual recognition; Memory; Animal-robot interaction; Robot; Dog

Funding

  1. Eotvos Lorand University
  2. Office for Supported Research Groups (MTA-ELTE Comparative Ethology Research Group) [MTA 01 031]
  3. National Research, Development and Innovation Office (ELTE Thematic Excellence Programme 2020) [TKP2020-IKA-05]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Investigation of individual recognition (IR) is difficult due to the lack of proper control of cues and previous experiences of subjects. The use of artificial agents (Unidentified Moving Objects: UMOs) may provide a better approach for dogs to develop IR. The results suggest that dogs are unable to recognize an individual UMO or human after a short experience but they remember the interaction with the partner in general, even after a long delay.
Investigation of individual recognition (IR) is difficult due to the lack of proper control of cues and previous experiences of subjects. Utilization of artificial agents (Unidentified Moving Objects: UMOs) may offer a better approach than using conspecifics or humans as partners. In Experiment 1, we investigated whether dogs are able to develop IR of UMOs (that is stable for at least 24 h) or that they only retain a more generalised memory about them. The UMO helped dogs to obtain an unreachable ball and played with them. One day, one week or one month later, we tested whether dogs display specific behaviour toward the familiar UMO over unfamiliar ones (four-way choice test). Dogs were also re-tested in the same helping context and playing interaction. Subjects did not approach the familiar UMO sooner than the others; however, they gazed at the familiar UMO earlier during re-testing of the problem solving task, irrespectively of the delay. In Experiment 2, we repeated the same procedure with human partners, applying a two-way choice test after a week delay, to study whether lack of IR was specific to the UMO. Dogs did not approach the familiar human sooner than the unfamiliar, but they gazed at the familiar partner earlier during re-testing. Thus, dogs do not seem to recognise an individual UMO or human after a short experience, but they remember the interaction with the novel partner in general, even after a long delay. We suggest that dogs need more experience with a specific social partner for the development of long-term memory.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available