4.6 Article

Productive performance, lipid profile, immunity, and antioxidant parameters of quail breeders fed low protein diets supplemented with different zinc sources

Journal

ANIMAL BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages 1737-1744

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10495398.2022.2047992

Keywords

Laying quails; protein; zinc; egg; blood

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The current study aimed to investigate the impact of different sources of zinc on low-CP protein diets in quail breeders. The results showed that different protein levels and zinc sources did not significantly affect feed intake, feed conversion ratio, and egg mass. In the growing stage, lower protein levels and optimal zinc sources can maintain the egg quality, lipid profile, immune, and antioxidant parameters in quail breeders.
The current study was conducted to study the impact of low-CP protein diets with different sources of zinc (zinc oxide-ZnO and zinc methionine-Zn-Met) on performance, lipid profile, immune and antioxidant parameters of quail breeders. A total number of 216 Japanese quail at 8 weeks of age were randomly distributed into nine (3 x 3) groups, with four replicates, each of six quails (four females and two males). Quails were fed three levels of CP (16, 18, and 20%) and three sources of Zn (0, 0.1 g ZnO, and 0.1 g Zn-Met/kg diets). No significant differences in daily feed intake (FI), feed conversion ratio (FCR), and egg mass are due to the main effect of protein levels or zinc sources at all ages. Dietary CP (16 and 20%) in growing quail diets increased SOD and GSH, while IgG levels were improved by 18%. Finally, it can be recommended that 16% CP and zinc source (Zn-Met or ZnO) can maintain egg mass, as well as lipid profile, immunological and antioxidant parameters in Japanese quails breeders. This level (16% CP) is enough during the production stage and a valuable way for mitigating ammonia pollution and reducing feeding costs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available