4.8 Article

One-Step C2H4 Purification from Ternary C2H6/C2H4/C2H2 Mixtures by a Robust Metal-Organic Framework with Customized Pore Environment

Journal

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
Volume 61, Issue 28, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202205427

Keywords

Crystal Structures; Ethylene Purification; Gas Adsorption; Hydrocarbon Separation; Metal-Organic Frameworks

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [21871220, 21971207]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reports a robust metal-organic framework (MOF) with methyl-decorated nonpolar pores that achieves one-step purification of C2H4 from binary and ternary C2H6/C2H4/C2H2 mixtures. The MOF exhibits high C2H6 and C2H2 uptakes and surpasses all previously reported MOFs in terms of C2H6/C2H4 selectivity for C2H4 purification. The presence of methyl groups in the pores enhances the adsorption capacity for C2H2 and C2H6 compared to C2H4.
One-step C2H4 purification from ternary C2H6/C2H4/C2H2 mixtures by a single adsorbent is of great industrial significance, but few adsorbents achieve this separation. Herein, we report a robust metal-organic framework (MOF) that possesses methyl-decorated nonpolar pores and shows one-step C2H4 purification (purity >99.9 %) from binary C2H6/C2H4 mixtures and ternary C2H6/C2H4/C2H2 mixtures. The methyl groups in pores provide a suitable pore environment to simultaneously enhance the adsorption capacity for C2H2 and C2H6 compared to C2H4. Simulations revealed the multiple interactions between C2H6 or C2H2 molecules and the pore wall, while the interactions with C2H4 molecules are weak and also unfavorable due to the repulsion from methyl groups in pores. The MOF displays high C2H6 and C2H2 uptakes and benchmark C2H6/C2H4 selectivity (2.2), surpassing all of the reported MOFs for one-step C2H4 purification from ternary C2H6/C2H4/C2H2 mixtures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available