4.3 Article

Signal-enhanced visual strand exchange amplification detection of African swine fever virus by the introduction of multimeric G-quadruplex/hemin DNAzyme

Journal

ANALYTICAL SCIENCES
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages 675-682

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1007/s44211-022-00087-6

Keywords

Multimeric G-quadruplex; DNAzyme; Strand exchange amplification; African swine fever virus; Visual detection

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31972158]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a visual strand exchange amplification detection assay was developed for the detection of African swine fever virus (ASFV). The assay showed rapid and sensitive detection of ASFV through amplification of specific DNA sequences and colorimetric signals. The results of this study could be helpful for the development of better visual detection assays.
African swine fever virus (ASFV) causes hemorrhagic infectious disease in pigs with a fatality rate of nearly 100%. In this study, we developed a visual strand exchange amplification detection assay for ASFV. In the presence of ASFV, DNA amplification products containing multimeric G-quadruplex sequences were amplified by strand exchange amplification. These G-quadruplexes, assembled with hemin to form DNAzyme, displayed enhanced significant turned-on colorimetric signals to indicate detection results. The results showed that dimeric DNAzyme had the best visualization effect. Under the optimal reaction parameters, there was a linear relationship between the absorbance of the reaction solution at 417 nm and the logarithm of ASFV concentration ranged from 1 x 10(1) to 1 x 10(3) copies/mu L, and the detection limit was 2.7 copies/mu L. We hoped this visual assay could be helpful in the rapid and sensitive detection of ASFV, and the results of multimeric G-quadruplex/hemin DNAzyme could be helpful for the development of better visual detection assays.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available