4.7 Article

Data reduction by randomization subsampling for the study of large hyperspectral datasets

Journal

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 1209, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2022.339793

Keywords

Randomization; Sub-sampling; Data reduction; Principal component analysis; Hyperspectral imaging; Time series

Funding

  1. FAPESP [2020/09198-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This tutorial explores how data reduction can be used to analyze time series hyperspectral images faster and compares the benefits and drawbacks of two common data reduction methods.
Large amount of information in hyperspectral images (HSI) generally makes their analysis (e.g., principal component analysis, PCA) time consuming and often requires a lot of random access memory (RAM) and high computing power. This is particularly problematic for analysis of large images, containing millions of pixels, which can be created by augmenting series of single images (e.g., in time series analysis). This tutorial explores how data reduction can be used to analyze time series hyperspectral images much faster without losing crucial analytical information. Two of the most common data reduction methods have been chosen from the recent research. The first one uses a simple randomization method called randomized sub-sampling PCA (RSPCA). The second implies a more robust randomization method based on local-rank approximations (rPCA). This manuscript exposes the major benefits and drawbacks of both methods with the spirit of being as didactical as possible for a reader. A comprehensive comparison is made considering the amount of information retained by the PCA models at different compression degrees and the performance time. Extrapolation is also made to the case where the effect of time and any other factor are to be studied simultaneously. (c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available