4.1 Review

Review of Outcomes of Low Verses Standard Pressure Pneumoperitoneum in Laparoscopic Surgery

Journal

AMERICAN SURGEON
Volume 88, Issue 8, Pages 1832-1837

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/00031348221084956

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study suggests that low-pressure pneumoperitoneum is feasible and can lead to decreased postoperative pain and reduced use of narcotics. It also has the potential to lower peak inspiratory pressures and CO2 absorption during surgery.
Background Carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopy changes cardiorespiratory physiology and contributes to post-op pain. We studied outcomes before and after implementing low-pressure pneumoperitoneum QI project. Methods Forty-two patients were insufflated at standard pressures (15 mmHg) while 41 were insufflated using low (8-12 mmHg) during laparoscopic procedures. These variables were obtained from the patient chart: pain scores, intravenous morphine milligram equivalents (MME), peak inspiratory pressures (PIP), end-tidal CO2 (EtCO2), surgery duration, and patient demographics. The study was conducted after IRB approval. Results Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum is feasible and the surgeon can increase to 10-12 mmHg as needed. The mean post-op IV MME was significantly decreased in the low-pressure group (11.75 +/- 10.41) compared to the standard pressure group (17.36 +/- 18.1) (t-test, P = .047). Mean peak inspiratory pressures during insufflation were significantly higher for procedures conducted at standard pressure (31.40 +/- 4.82) compared to the 8 mmHg (24.68 +/- 4.19) and 12 mmHg (27.33 +/- 3.85) low pressure groups (one-way ANOVA, P < .0001). During insufflation, there was a significant increase in the average EtCO2 in the standard pressure group (42.07 +/- 5.60) compared to the 8 mmHg low pressure group (37.59 +/- 5.05) (ANOVA, P = .0096). Constant flow insufflation was more likely to be performed at low pressure than demand mode (58% v. 33%). Conclusion Low pressure pneumoperitoneum decreases PIP pressure and CO2 absorption evidenced by lower ETCO2 intra-operatively. Patients have significant improvement in postoperative pain evidenced by decreased narcotics needed. Low pressure pneumoperitoneum using a constant flow insufflator is safe and results in improved patient outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available