4.1 Article

Evaluation of the accuracy of three-dimensionally printed patient-specific guides for transsphenoidal hypophysectomy in small-breed dogs

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH
Volume 83, Issue 5, Pages 465-472

Publisher

AMER VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.21.09.0154

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2020R1A2C1101286]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study assessed the accuracy of transsphenoidal hypophysectomy using 3D printed patient-specific guides in small-breed dogs. The results showed that the use of patient-specific guides resulted in high precision in terms of the position accuracy and favorable outcomes in the shape, size, and position of the surgical window.
OBJECTIVE To assess the accuracy of transsphenoidal hypophysectomy using 3-D printed patient-specific guides (3D-PSGs) in small-breed dogs. ANIMALS Heads obtained from the cadavers of 19 small-breed dogs (ex vivo portion of study) and 3 healthy adult (3 to 4 years) purpose-bred Beagles with a median body weight of 9.2 kg. PROCEDURES In the ex vivo study, CT images of the cadavers were collected. The position, width, and length of the pituitary fossa and the pilot hole (insertion angle and place) were measured. Using PSGs, 19 pilot holes were made for the pituitary gland fossa, and CT was performed to assess the position accuracy. In the in vivo study, 3 surgical windows from the pilot holes were made using PSGs. Repeated CT and MRI were performed to evaluate the safeness and effectiveness of PSGs, followed by necropsy. RESULTS In the ex vivo study, the median (interquartile range) difference between the pre- and postoperative insertion angles was 2 degrees (0 degrees to 3.5 degrees) and the median deviation of the pilot hole was 0.46 mm (0 to 1.58 mm). In the in vivo study, the surrounding structures were not damaged, and favorable outcomes were evident in terms of the shape, size, and position of the surgical window.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available