4.7 Article

The Effect of a Liberal Approach to Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients with Type 2 Diabetes A Multicenter, Parallel-Group, Open-Label Randomized Clinical Trial

Journal

Publisher

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202202-0329OC

Keywords

blood glucose; critical illness; diabetes; hypoglycemia; intensive care

Funding

  1. Melbourne Academic Centre for Health Rapid Applied Research Translation Grant
  2. Diabetes Australia Research Trust
  3. Royal Australasian College of Physicians Diabetes Australia Research Establishment Fellowship
  4. Royal Adelaide Hospital Research Committee Project Grant
  5. Intensive Care Foundation Fisher and Paykel Research Project Grant
  6. Faculty of Health Sciences Divisional Scholarship
  7. Royal Adelaide Hospital Research Committee Dawes Top-up Scholarship
  8. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Career Development Fellowship
  9. HRC
  10. Health Research Council (HRC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the effect of blood glucose target range on patient outcomes in ICU patients with type 2 diabetes. The results show that a liberal approach to blood glucose targets can reduce the incidence of hypoglycemia, but does not improve patient-centered outcomes.
Rationale: Blood glucose concentrations affect outcomes in critically ill patients, but the optimal target blood glucose range in those with type 2 diabetes is unknown. Objectives: To evaluate the effects of a liberal approach to targeted blood glucose range during ICU admission. Methods: This mutlicenter, parallel-group, open-label randomized clinical trial included 419 adult patients with type 2 diabetes expected to be in the ICU on at least three consecutive days. In the intervention group intravenous insulin was commenced at a blood glucose >252 mg/dl and titrated to a target range of 180-252 mg/dl. In the comparator group insulin was commenced at a blood glucose >180 mg/dl and titrated to a target range of 108-180 mg/dl. The primary outcome was incident hypoglycemia (<72 mg/dl). Secondary outcomes included glucose metrics and clinical outcomes. Measurements and Main Results: By Day 28, at least one episode of hypoglycemia occurred in 10 of 210 (5%) patients assigned the intervention and 38 of 209 (18%) patients assigned the comparator (incident rate ratio, 0.21 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.09 to 0.49]; P < 0.001). Those assigned the intervention had greater blood glucose concentrations (daily mean, minimum, maximum), less glucose variability, and less relative hypoglycemia (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). By Day 90, 62 of 210 (29.5%) in the intervention and 52 of 209 (24.9%) in the comparator group had died (absolute difference, 4.6 percentage points [95% CI, -3.9% to 13.2%]; P = 0.29). Conclusions: A liberal approach to blood glucose targets reduced incident hypoglycemia but did not improve patientcentered outcomes.'

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available