4.6 Review

Permanent Supportive Housing With Housing First: Findings From a Community Guide Systematic Economic Review

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
Volume 62, Issue 3, Pages E188-E201

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.08.009

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the economic cost and benefit of Housing First Programs. The results show that the economic benefits exceed the cost of Housing First Programs in the U.S., but there were too few studies to determine cost-benefit in the Canadian context.
Introduction: The annual economic burden of chronic homelessness in the U.S. is estimated to be as high as $3.4 billion. The Permanent Supportive Housing with Housing First (Housing First) program, implemented to address the problem, has been shown to be effective. This paper examines the economic cost and benefit of Housing First Programs. Methods: The search of peer-reviewed and gray literature from inception of databases through November 2019 yielded 20 evaluation studies of Housing First Programs, 17 from the U.S. and 3 from Canada. All analyses were conducted from March 2019 through July 2020. Monetary values are reported in 2019 U.S. dollars. Results: Evidence from studies conducted in the U.S. was separated from those conducted in Canada. The median intervention cost per person per year for U.S. studies was $16,479, and for all studies, including those from Canada, it was $16,336. The median total benefit for the U.S. studies was $18,247 per person per year, and it was $17,751 for all studies, including those from Canada. The benefit-to-cost ratio for U.S. studies was 1.80:1, and for all studies, including those from Canada, it was 1.06:1. Discussion: The evidence from this review shows that economic benefits exceed the cost of Housing First Programs in the U.S. There were too few studies to determine cost-benefit in the Canadian context. (C) 2021 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available