4.7 Article

Estradiol deficiency reduces the satellite cell pool by impairing cell cycle progression

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-CELL PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 322, Issue 6, Pages C1123-C1137

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00429.2021

Keywords

muscle stem cells; ovariectomy; satellite cell cycling; skeletal muscle

Funding

  1. National Institute of Health (NIH) [R01-AG062899, R01-AG031743, T32-AG029796, T32-AR007612]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that the size of the satellite cell pool is reduced in estradiol (E-2)-deficient female mice and humans. By using a combination of in vivo and in vitro approaches, they identified mechanisms whereby E-2 deficiency impairs satellite cell maintenance.
The size of the satellite cell pool is reduced in estradiol (E-2)-deficient female mice and humans. Here, we use a combination of in vivo and in vitro approaches to identify mechanisms, whereby E-2 deficiency impairs satellite cell maintenance. By measuring satellite cell numbers in mice at several early time points postovariectomy (Ovx), we determine that satellite cell numbers decline by 33% between 10 and 14 days post-Ovx in tibialis anterior and gastrocnemius muscles. At 14 days post-Ovx, we demonstrate that satellite cells have a reduced propensity to transition from G(0)/G(1) to S and G(2)/M phases, compared with cells from ovary-intact mice, associated with changes in two key satellite cell cycle regulators, ccna2 and p16(INK4a). Further, freshly isolated satellite cells treated with E-2 in vitro have 62% greater cell proliferation and require less time to complete the first division. Using clonal and differentiation assays, we measured 69% larger satellite cell colonies and enhanced satellite cell-derived myoblast differentiation with E-2 treatment compared with vehicle-treated cells. Together, these results identify a novel mechanism for preservation of the satellite cell pool by E-2 via promotion of satellite cell cycling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available