4.5 Article

Identifying Delirium in Persons With Moderate or Severe Dementia: Review of Challenges and an Illustrative Approach

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY
Volume 30, Issue 10, Pages 1067-1078

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jagp.2022.04.003

Keywords

Advanced dementia delirium; delirium superimposed on dementia; ECT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Delirium and dementia are common causes of cognitive impairment among older adults, often coexisting. Detecting delirium in the presence of dementia is challenging due to overlapping symptoms. However, detecting delirium is crucial for reducing poor clinical outcomes in this population.
Delirium and dementia are common causes of cognitive impairment among older adults, which often coexist. Delirium is associated with poor clinical outcomes, and is more frequent and more severe in patients with dementia. Identifying delirium in the presence of dementia, also described as delirium superimposed on dementia (DSD), is particularly challenging, as symptoms of delirium such as inattention, cognitive dysfunction, and altered level of consciousness, are also features of dementia. Because DSD is associated with poorer clinical outcomes than dementia alone, detecting delirium is important for reducing morbidity and mortality in this population. We review a number of delirium screening instruments that have shown promise for use in DSD, including the 4-DSD, combined Six Item Cognitive Impairment Test (6-CIT) and 4 'A's Test (4AT), Confusion Assessment Method (CAM), and the combined UB2 and 3D-CAM (UB-CAM). Each has advantages and disadvantages. We then describe the operationalization of a CAM-based approach in a current ECT in dementia project as an example of modifying an existing instrument for patients with moderate to severe dementia. Ultimately, any instrument modified will need to be validated against a standard clinical reference, in order to

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available